
How do you add terpenes to flower? It is a question increasingly asked by people researching CBD flower, hemp flower, cannabis flower, Type 3 flower and terpene-infused botanical products. The principle sounds simple, but concentrated terpenes are powerful volatile compounds and successful aroma infusion requires considerably more control than simply dripping or spraying terpene concentrate onto dried flower.
Terpenes are naturally occurring aromatic compounds found throughout the plant kingdom. In cannabis flower and hemp flower they form a major part of the plant’s characteristic aroma, alongside numerous other volatile compounds. Drying, curing, storage, temperature and oxygen exposure can all change this aromatic profile over time.
As a result, professional formulators sometimes use terpene profiles to reproduce, modify or strengthen the aroma of dried botanical material. This is often described online using phrases such as adding terpenes to flower, infusing flower with terpenes, adding terpenes to CBD flower, spraying terpenes on hemp flower or restoring terpenes to dry flower.
The underlying chemistry is the same in each case: volatile molecules are being introduced to a porous botanical material. The quality of the result depends on terpene composition, concentration, temperature, distribution and storage rather than simply using as much terpene as possible.
This guide examines how terpene infusion works, the terminology around CBD flower, hemp flower and Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 cannabis flower, how professional flower infusion differs from crude spraying, and why terpene profiles should be selected primarily according to chemistry and aroma.
The controlled approach to terpene flower infusion is to treat it as an aroma-distribution process rather than pouring concentrated liquid directly onto dried plant material. In lawful botanical or appropriately licensed professional settings, terpene profiles can be introduced through controlled headspace exposure, validated atomisation or specialist processing systems. The aim is even aroma distribution while avoiding concentrated hotspots, unnecessary heat and excessive terpene loading.
Search terminology around flower is often confusing because commercial language, botanical terminology and regulatory language do not always mean the same thing.
Cannabis flower is the broad botanical term for the flowering material of Cannabis sativa. Hemp flower is commonly used commercially for cannabis cultivars selected for hemp characteristics, while CBD flower generally refers to CBD-dominant cannabis flower.
CBD bud and hemp bud are also widely used search terms for essentially the same general product category.
None of these marketing terms tells you the complete chemistry of the plant.
A CBD flower can contain many cannabinoids and dozens of volatile compounds. Likewise, two hemp flower samples with similar CBD concentrations can have completely different terpene profiles and therefore completely different aromas.
The terms Type 1 flower, Type 2 flower and Type 3 flower describe cannabis chemotypes based primarily on the relationship between THC and CBD.
This terminology has become increasingly common among growers, breeders, hemp flower communities and people discussing cannabinoid genetics online.
The commonly used Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 cannabis chemotype system.
| Flower Type | General Cannabinoid Pattern | Common Description | Terpene Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 flower | THC-predominant | Commonly associated with conventional THC-dominant cannabis genetics | Can contain any number of terpene profiles depending on cultivar and phenotype |
| Type 2 flower | Mixed or approximately balanced THC and CBD | Often described as mixed-ratio or balanced cannabis flower | Terpene chemistry remains independent of the simple THC-to-CBD classification |
| Type 3 flower | CBD-predominant | Frequently associated with what consumers call CBD flower or CBD hemp flower | Can display the same broad families of cannabis terpene profiles found across other chemotypes |
The classification is chemical rather than aromatic.
A Type 3 flower is not automatically citrus, earthy, kush-like or fruity simply because CBD is the dominant cannabinoid. The aroma still depends on the individual terpene profile and other volatile compounds expressed by the genetics.
Type 3 flower is the term increasingly used for CBD-dominant cannabis flower.
In practical search language, people may use Type 3 flower, CBD flower, CBD hemp flower, hemp flower and CBD bud when researching broadly similar CBD-dominant cannabis genetics.
The Type 3 description is useful because it focuses on cannabinoid chemotype rather than relying on older and often imprecise labels such as indica and sativa.
It is not, however, a legal classification.
A Type 3 designation describes cannabinoid dominance. It does not determine the regulatory status of cannabis flower in a particular jurisdiction.
For UK readers, terms such as CBD flower, hemp flower and Type 3 flower should not be interpreted as automatic legal categories. Home Office guidance states that cannabis flowers and leaves are controlled parts of the plant irrespective of whether they come from a low-THC industrial hemp variety. The frequently quoted 0.2% figure relates to the industrial hemp cultivation regime and approved varieties rather than creating a general finished-product exemption for cannabis flower.
There is separately an exempt-product definition within UK controlled-drug regulations that can apply to certain preparations or products where all relevant criteria are met.
The Government Chemist’s analytical guidance discusses a limit of one milligram of controlled drug in relation to that exemption. It also notes uncertainty over whether this is interpreted individually for each psychoactive cannabinoid or collectively. For analytical purposes, the guidance takes the more conservative approach of treating the threshold as the combined total of relevant psychoactive controlled cannabinoids.
This is a different regulatory concept from the 0.2% industrial hemp cultivation figure and should not be treated as a blanket rule that turns raw cannabis flower into an exempt product.
For businesses working with cannabis flower, hemp flower or other controlled plant material, the appropriate licensing and regulatory position should therefore be established independently for the actual activity being undertaken.
People search for how to add terpenes to CBD flower for several reasons.
Some are trying to recreate an aroma lost during drying or storage. Others are researching how commercial terpene-infused flower is produced. Some want to understand why one CBD flower strain smells considerably stronger than another, while manufacturers may be developing lawful botanical products or working under appropriate licensing.
The common objectives include:
What terpene addition does not do is create more CBD, CBG or other cannabinoids.
Terpenes are volatile compounds.
They can evaporate at temperatures far below their boiling points, including ordinary room temperature.
This is why CBD flower, hemp flower and cannabis flower can gradually lose aromatic intensity during poor storage.
Common causes of terpene loss include:
The lighter components of a cannabis terpene profile may be lost faster than heavier constituents, so aged CBD bud may not simply become weaker smelling. Its aromatic balance can also change.
Our guide to terpene evaporation, burning and degradation temperatures explains why this occurs.
Natural terpene-rich flower and terpene-infused flower are not necessarily the same thing.
Naturally aromatic cannabis flower produces its volatile profile during plant growth and maturation.
Terpene-infused flower has additional aromatic material introduced after harvest or processing.
Natural terpene-rich flower compared with post-process terpene-infused flower.
| Feature | Naturally Terpene-Rich Flower | Terpene-Infused Flower |
|---|---|---|
| Origin of aroma | Produced naturally by the plant | Natural aroma may be supplemented or modified after harvest |
| Profile complexity | Can contain a wide range of naturally co-occurring volatile compounds | Depends on the complexity of the terpene profile being introduced |
| Batch consistency | Natural agricultural variation is expected | Processing can potentially improve sensory consistency when properly controlled |
| Aroma intensity | Determined by genetics, cultivation, harvest and storage | Can be adjusted during processing |
| Uniformity | Can vary naturally between flowers | Depends heavily on the quality of the infusion process |
Professional terpene infusion is fundamentally a mass-transfer and formulation problem.
The goal is to move a controlled amount of volatile aromatic material into or around dried botanical flower as evenly as possible.
Commercial and laboratory approaches can include:
The important word is controlled.
The presence of sophisticated equipment does not automatically guarantee an even result. Batch size, temperature, botanical moisture, terpene concentration, mixing behaviour and exposure time all influence distribution.
When people search specifically for how to add terpenes to CBD flower, the chemistry does not change because CBD is the dominant cannabinoid.
Terpenes interact with the flower as volatile aromatic compounds.
For lawful botanical development or appropriately licensed professional work, a controlled workflow usually involves:
The same formulation principles apply whether the material is being described commercially as CBD flower, CBD bud, hemp flower or Type 3 flower.
Hemp flower is another common search term associated with terpene infusion.
From a botanical chemistry perspective, hemp flower is still cannabis flower. Its aroma is produced by combinations of terpenes and other volatile plant compounds.
The process of modifying its aroma therefore relies on the same fundamentals:
Calling the material hemp flower does not change these physical principles.
Searches for adding terpenes to cannabis flower frequently involve the same basic goal: modifying the aromatic profile of dried cannabis material.
In licensed cultivation, research or manufacturing environments, post-harvest terpene processing may be used to investigate aroma development or finished-product consistency.
The underlying variables include flower surface area, existing terpene content, profile composition, temperature, moisture, headspace and time.
The cannabinoid chemotype, whether Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3, does not remove the need to control these variables.
This is one of the highest-intent questions around terpene-infused flower.
Spraying sounds straightforward, but crude spraying can create problems.
A standard hand sprayer does not guarantee uniform droplet size or even coverage. One section of CBD flower may receive considerably more concentrated aromatic material than another.
This can produce:
Commercial atomisation is different because equipment and process conditions can be validated.
That distinction is important when comparing professional terpene infusion with simply spraying concentrated terpenes onto flower.
Applying concentrated terpene liquid directly onto individual CBD buds creates poor control over distribution.
Concentrated terpenes are powerful aromatic chemicals, and some also have significant solvent properties.
A direct droplet therefore produces a local concentration far higher than the surrounding flower.
This is one reason controlled infusion methods focus on distribution rather than simply getting terpene liquid onto the surface.
Headspace infusion uses the volatility of terpenes rather than direct liquid application.
In a closed environment, terpene molecules naturally enter the gas phase. Those volatile molecules can move throughout the available headspace and interact with botanical surfaces.
This principle is relevant to professional aroma development because it separates the concentrated source from the dried botanical material.
The process is influenced by:
Because different terpenes have different vapour pressures, the composition of the headspace can also change over time.
Vacuum processing is another term commonly encountered in discussions about terpene-infused flower.
Changing pressure can influence gas movement and the behaviour of volatile compounds inside porous materials.
Professional vacuum-assisted botanical processing can therefore be used as one tool for aroma distribution.
However, vacuum alone does not guarantee uniform terpene infusion.
The result still depends on pressure profile, botanical structure, moisture, temperature, terpene composition, equipment geometry and process time.
Commercial uniformity should therefore be demonstrated rather than assumed.
Type 3 flower terpene infusion simply means modifying the aromatic profile of CBD-dominant cannabis flower.
Type 3 genetics can naturally produce highly complex terpene profiles, including combinations of:
If additional terpenes are introduced, the objective may be to recreate the original profile, strengthen selected aromatic notes or create a new strain-inspired profile.
There is no single best terpene for CBD flower because the desired result is subjective.
It is more useful to choose according to aroma family.
Common terpene families used when describing CBD flower and cannabis flower aromas.
| Terpene | Typical Aroma | Common Flower Description |
|---|---|---|
| Limonene | Citrus, lemon, orange | Zesty, bright, citrus-forward |
| Myrcene | Earthy, herbal, musky | Earthy, kush-like, herbal |
| Alpha-pinene | Pine, resinous, fresh | Pine, forest, sharp herbal |
| Beta-caryophyllene | Peppery, woody, spicy | Spice, wood, gas-style depth |
| Linalool | Floral, lavender, lightly spicy | Floral, soft, sweet |
| Terpinolene | Fresh, floral, herbal, citrus | Complex fresh or haze-style profiles |
| Humulene | Woody, herbal, hop-like | Earthy, dry, woody character |
The finished aroma comes from the complete profile rather than the presence of one terpene alone.
Botanical terpene profiles are constructed using terpene compounds obtained from plant sources other than cannabis.
Because individual terpene molecules can occur across many different species, botanical terpenes can be blended to reproduce cannabis-inspired aroma profiles.
For example, limonene can be sourced from citrus, pinene from botanical sources rich in pine-like compounds and beta-caryophyllene from sources such as clove or other aromatic plants.
Professional formulation allows these ingredients to be combined in precise ratios to create strain-inspired terpene blends.
You can explore the wider Canavape terpene collection for botanical and strain-inspired profiles.
Cannabis-derived terpenes, commonly abbreviated to CDTs, are collected directly from cannabis plant material.
This means they can retain a naturally occurring mixture of volatile compounds associated with the source plant rather than reconstructing the aroma from terpenes obtained from other botanical species.
For people researching authentic cannabis flower aroma, CDTs can therefore provide a different profile from simpler botanical reconstructions.
Our dedicated cannabis-derived terpene range contains plant-extracted aromatic profiles for professional formulation and aroma-development applications.
How botanical and cannabis-derived terpene profiles differ when discussing flower aroma.
| Feature | Botanical Terpenes | Cannabis-Derived Terpenes |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Non-cannabis botanical sources | Cannabis plant material |
| Profile design | Can be reconstructed or deliberately designed | Captures naturally co-occurring volatile compounds from the source plant |
| Consistency | High degree of control can be achieved through formulation | Natural variation can occur between plant material and batches |
| Minor compounds | Depends on the complexity of the formulation | Can contain numerous naturally occurring trace volatiles |
| Typical objective | Consistency, aroma design and strain-inspired profiles | Authentic cannabis-derived aromatic character |
Another common search is how to restore terpenes to dry CBD flower.
The first distinction is that adding aroma is not the same as restoring the original plant chemistry.
If volatile terpenes have evaporated from aged CBD flower, introducing a new profile can increase aromatic intensity.
It cannot reverse every chemical change that occurred during storage.
Oxidised cannabinoids, oxidised terpenes, physical damage and microbial deterioration are not repaired simply by adding a fresh aroma profile.
It is therefore more accurate to describe the process as aroma enhancement or terpene reintroduction rather than complete restoration.
Terpene concentrate and water are different things.
Adding terpenes should not be treated as a method of correcting the moisture content of excessively dry botanical flower.
Moisture specification, water activity and terpene composition are separate quality variables.
If commercial dried botanical material needs moisture management, that should be addressed using a process appropriate to the botanical material rather than by adding additional concentrated aroma compounds.
There is no universal percentage that applies to every CBD flower, hemp flower, Type 3 flower or terpene profile.
Numbers frequently repeated online can create false precision because different terpene blends have very different compositions and sensory intensities.
The appropriate level depends on:
A professionally developed process therefore uses a documented specification rather than assuming one percentage works across every strain and every terpene blend.
Terpenes are potent.
An over-infused CBD flower profile can smell perfume-like, solvent-like or unnaturally sharp.
More aromatic material does not necessarily produce a more authentic cannabis aroma.
Many of the most convincing natural flower profiles rely on minor constituents and careful ratios rather than one or two terpenes at very high concentration.
Balance is therefore more important than maximum strength.
Adding terpenes does not increase the amount of CBD already present in CBD flower.
Likewise, adding terpenes does not convert Type 3 flower into Type 2 or Type 1 flower because those classifications refer primarily to cannabinoid chemotype.
Terpenes can change aroma and sensory character without changing the fundamental cannabinoid classification.
Scientific research continues into specific terpene-cannabinoid interactions, but it is not accurate to claim that adding a terpene blend automatically increases cannabinoid potency.
Read how terpenes affect the body and your experience for a detailed review of that evidence.
The entourage effect describes proposed interactions between cannabinoids, terpenes and other cannabis constituents.
Some specific interactions have experimental support, while others remain theoretical or primarily based on preclinical research.
Adding terpenes to CBD flower therefore does not automatically guarantee an entourage effect or make a botanical product stronger.
The actual chemistry of the finished mixture matters.
Not necessarily.
The Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 system primarily describes cannabinoid chemotype.
The same terpene molecules can occur across all three.
A Type 1 cultivar and a Type 3 cultivar may both contain myrcene, limonene and beta-caryophyllene while differing dramatically in cannabinoid composition.
This is why terpene profile and cannabinoid profile should be considered as separate layers of cannabis chemistry.
Yes.
Cannabinoid dominance does not determine aroma on its own.
Modern Type 3 flower genetics can express highly complex citrus, gas, kush, dessert, berry, pine and tropical terpene profiles that are aromatically similar to profiles found in Type 1 cannabis.
This is one reason consumers increasingly use chemotype terminology rather than assuming aroma predicts cannabinoid composition.
No reliable conclusion about cannabinoid content can be drawn from smell alone.
Many of the same terpene molecules occur across CBD-dominant and THC-dominant cannabis varieties.
A strong cannabis aroma is evidence of volatile chemistry, not proof of a particular cannabinoid concentration.
Laboratory analysis is required to establish cannabinoid composition.
A well-balanced terpene-infused botanical material should have an integrated aroma rather than smelling as though fragrance has simply been placed on its surface.
Common aromatic families include:
Complexity usually comes from the ratio between compounds rather than one dominant ingredient alone.
There is no universal shelf life.
Terpene retention depends heavily on packaging and environment.
Heat increases volatility. Repeatedly opening a container replaces terpene-rich headspace with fresh air. Oxygen and light can also contribute to chemical change.
A well-sealed product kept under appropriate conditions will therefore preserve its aromatic profile better than the same flower kept warm in a frequently opened container.
For full storage guidance, see how to store and preserve terpenes.
Container choice matters because volatile aromatic compounds can escape through some packaging materials or interact with certain polymers.
For concentrated terpene handling, glass offers strong chemical compatibility.
For finished dried botanical material, commercial packaging also needs to account for:
A package that protects aroma poorly can undo much of the work involved in developing a terpene-rich flower profile.
Temperature affects terpene vapour pressure.
As a general rule, warmer conditions increase the rate at which volatile compounds move into the gas phase.
This means excessive heat can cause terpene-infused CBD flower or hemp flower to lose aroma more quickly.
Different terpene molecules also have different volatility, which means heat can change the relative balance of a profile rather than simply reducing every compound equally.
Our guide to terpene evaporation and degradation temperatures covers this in detail.
Professional testing can involve gas chromatography to identify and quantify volatile compounds.
Rather than simply smelling a batch, producers can compare analytical samples taken from different parts of the botanical material.
This can help determine whether an infusion process has produced reasonable uniformity.
Professional quality control may consider:
Yes, if terpene analysis has actually been performed.
A cannabinoid COA and a terpene analysis are different analytical tests.
A detailed terpene report can identify compounds such as limonene, myrcene, pinene, linalool, terpinolene and beta-caryophyllene and report their relative or absolute concentration.
This is far more informative than relying solely on descriptive labels such as citrus, kush, relaxing or uplifting.
Terpenes themselves are chemically different from THC and the metabolites normally targeted in cannabis drug testing.
However, drug-test considerations depend on the composition of the complete product rather than whether terpenes have been added.
For a detailed explanation, read do terpenes show up on a drug test?
High aromatic concentration can overwhelm the natural flower profile and create an artificial or solvent-like aroma.
This creates localised concentration rather than controlled distribution.
The same physical principles of volatility, distribution and storage still apply.
Heat increases volatility and can distort a complex profile by accelerating the loss of lighter compounds.
Aromatic flower already has a profile. Adding another strong blend without considering the starting chemistry can create a confused result.
A stronger smell does not prove higher CBD, THC or overall cannabinoid potency.
Actual cannabinoid chemotype and terpene composition provide more useful chemical information than broad traditional strain categories.
Start with aroma rather than an effects chart.
If the objective is citrus, look towards limonene-rich profiles. For pine and resinous notes, pinene is an obvious contributor. Earthy and herbal profiles frequently contain myrcene, while beta-caryophyllene contributes pepper, spice and woody depth.
Complex strain-inspired profiles combine many compounds rather than relying on one terpene.
If authenticity to cannabis plant aroma is the objective, cannabis-derived terpene profiles offer a different proposition from botanical reconstructions.
Browse the Canavape terpene range or explore our cannabis-derived terpenes.
Professional terpene flower infusion is treated as a controlled aroma-distribution process. Techniques can include controlled headspace exposure, validated atomisation and specialist closed-vessel processing. The aim is even distribution without concentrated terpene hotspots or unnecessary heat.
The same terpene formulation principles apply to CBD flower as other dried botanical flower. The existing aroma is assessed, an appropriate terpene profile is selected, distribution is controlled and the finished material is protected from heat, light and excessive oxygen exposure.
Hemp flower aroma can be modified using the same professional terpene-processing principles used for other botanical material. The exact process depends on the terpene profile, existing flower chemistry, scale and intended finished-product specification.
Type 3 flower is CBD-predominant cannabis flower. The Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 system describes cannabinoid chemotypes, with Type 1 being THC-predominant, Type 2 mixed THC/CBD and Type 3 CBD-predominant. It is a chemical classification rather than a UK legal category.
Type 3 flower is commonly used to describe CBD-dominant cannabis genetics, so it overlaps strongly with what consumers call CBD flower or CBD hemp flower. However, CBD flower is a commercial description while Type 3 is a cannabinoid chemotype classification.
Yes. Type 3 flower can express many of the same terpenes and aromatic compounds found in other cannabis chemotypes. Cannabinoid dominance does not determine aroma on its own.
Not reliably. The same major terpene compounds can occur across Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 cannabis flower. Laboratory cannabinoid testing is required to establish chemotype accurately.
Crude spraying can create uneven droplets and localised concentration. Commercial atomisation can be engineered and validated for specific processing applications, but a simple hand sprayer does not provide the same control.
Direct application of concentrated terpene liquid creates poor distribution and highly concentrated localised areas. Controlled processing focuses on uniform aroma distribution rather than placing neat concentrate onto individual buds.
Terpene-infused flower is dried botanical flower whose aromatic profile has been supplemented or modified after harvest using additional terpene compounds or terpene profiles.
Adding a fresh terpene profile can increase or modify the aroma of older CBD flower, but it cannot reverse cannabinoid degradation, oxidation or other chemical changes that have already occurred. It is more accurate to describe this as aroma enhancement rather than complete restoration.
No. Terpene concentration and moisture content are separate variables. Adding terpenes should not be treated as a substitute for proper moisture and water-activity control in dried botanical material.
There is no universal percentage suitable for every terpene profile or flower type. Existing terpene content, blend composition, intended aroma, processing method and finished-product specification all affect the appropriate level.
Adding terpenes does not increase the CBD concentration of CBD flower and does not change a Type 3 cannabinoid chemotype into Type 1 or Type 2. Terpenes alter aroma and composition, while specific cannabinoid-terpene interactions remain an active area of research.
There is no single best terpene. Limonene contributes citrus notes, pinene produces pine and resinous aromas, myrcene contributes earthy and herbal character, beta-caryophyllene provides pepper and spice, and linalool contributes floral notes. Complex profiles combine several compounds.
Cannabis-derived terpenes can offer a naturally occurring collection of cannabis volatile compounds, while botanical profiles can provide excellent consistency and precise aroma design. The better choice depends on whether authenticity to the source plant or formulation control is the priority.
Terpenes do not increase the amount of CBD or other cannabinoids present in Type 3 flower. Research into cannabinoid-terpene interactions is ongoing, but aroma intensity should not be confused with cannabinoid potency.
No. The 0.2% figure is associated with the UK industrial hemp cultivation regime and approved varieties. Home Office guidance states that cannabis flowers and leaves remain controlled parts of the plant irrespective of whether they come from a low-THC industrial hemp variety.
The one milligram figure appears within the exempt-product framework for certain preparations or products where all relevant exemption criteria are satisfied. Government Chemist guidance notes uncertainty over whether the threshold applies separately or collectively to controlled psychoactive cannabinoids and uses the more conservative combined-total approach for analytical purposes. It should not be treated as a blanket exemption for cannabis flower.
Terpene-rich botanical material should be kept in suitable well-sealed packaging, protected from unnecessary heat and direct light. Repeated opening and poor packaging can accelerate the loss of volatile aromatic compounds.
Common terpene compounds are not the THC targets used in standard cannabis drug testing. Drug-test considerations depend on the complete product composition rather than whether a terpene profile has been added.
Adding terpenes to flower is ultimately a problem of aroma chemistry, distribution and process control.
The search may be phrased as how to add terpenes to CBD flower, how to infuse hemp flower with terpenes, how to restore terpenes to CBD bud, how to spray terpenes on flower or how to make terpene-infused Type 3 flower, but the underlying scientific principles remain the same.
Terpenes are concentrated volatile compounds. The objective is even aromatic distribution while avoiding excessive concentration, unnecessary heat and poor storage.
CBD flower, hemp flower and Type 3 flower are also terms that need to be understood correctly. Type 3 describes CBD-dominant cannabis chemistry. Type 2 describes a mixed THC/CBD chemotype, while Type 1 describes THC-predominant flower. These chemotype labels tell you about cannabinoid balance, not aroma and not legal status.
Terpene profiles exist as a separate layer of plant chemistry. Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 flower can all contain limonene, myrcene, pinene, linalool, beta-caryophyllene and numerous other volatile compounds.
For professional terpene infusion, the strongest approach is therefore to measure the starting material, select the aroma profile deliberately, control distribution, avoid crude direct application, validate the finished batch and protect the resulting profile during storage.
For further reading, explore what terpenes do, how terpenes affect the body and your experience, terpene evaporation and degradation temperatures, how to store and preserve terpenes and whether terpenes show up on a drug test.
You can also explore the complete Canavape terpene collection and our specialist cannabis-derived terpene profiles.
This article is provided for educational purposes and discusses terpene chemistry, cannabis chemotype terminology and botanical aroma processing. It is not legal advice and does not authorise the possession, supply or processing of controlled cannabis material. Any business working with controlled cannabis flower should operate under the licensing and regulatory framework applicable to its activities. Concentrated terpene materials should be handled in accordance with their technical and safety documentation.
Message us directly
I will be back soon